|
|
 |
HASSAN
KHANâS TRANSMISSION FIXATION
TEXT / REGINE BASHA
My conversation with Hassan
Khan began with a studio visit in Cairo, where he lives. It
continued in London where he was doing a residency at Gasworks
this past spring. In a London café, we discussed remedies for
writerâs block, since Hassan also writes. ãI like to write in
really busy, noisy placesä he stated, which seemed to
characterize more than just a preference.1
|
|
 |
|
Hassan Khan, stills from Kompressor Videos, 2006, looped single-channel
video, 11:09 minutes,
a component of the exhibition KOMPRESSOR, 2006, at
Gasworks Gallery, London (courtesy of the artist and Galerie
Chantal Crousel, Paris) |
Itâs as if the very energy
of the metropolis fueled his output of images and sound. Khan
works from, with, and in the face of, the physical and mental
demands of Cairo, a city teeming with a speculated population of
twenty-five million. While his practice÷which encompasses video,
photography, sound installation, music production, and
performance÷is not necessarily about Cairo, it is undeniably
caught up in its strong undertow. Processing, editing, and
distributing condensed moments of urban life, Khan positions
himself as both canny observer and
mediator.
 |
 |
|
Hassan Khan, Enginepie,
2006, vinyl print attached directly to the wall, 105 x 135 cm, a
component of the exhibition KOMPRESSOR, 2006, at Gasworks
Gallery, London (courtesy of the artist and Galerie Chantal
Crousel, Paris) |
Boundaries between public
and private spaces are porous in Cairo. Domestic lives overflow
into the streets and rooftops. Engaging with the cityâs street
life, its characters, and its material and sonic excess, Khanâs
work operates between a document, a stage, and an operating
table. Because of this, we are never quite sure where he
positions himself in the mix÷fabulist or truth-seeker? ãI am
interested in the leap, the shift, the gap÷the space where one
meaning is born·.where we are both forgotten and found.ä While
Khanâs disjunctive narratives and fragmentary images give a lot
to the viewer, they say very little. Attempting to further the
work, you enter it as an active reader. Here, as you are about
to form causal judgments, you may encounter strands that elicit
identification. You may also lose yourself in the rabbit holes,
dissolving in the workâs content. Questions about individuality
and anonymity arise. In this sense÷on some inverted level÷you
may be experiencing Cairo itself. How do you articulate yourself
when you are connected to millions? Where are the synaptic
points?
 |
 |
|
Hassan Khan, performance view of
17 and in AUC, 2003,
performance in old downtown apartment in Cairo, soundproofed
one-way mirrored glass room, microphones, amplifiers, speakers
embedded in the glass
(courtesy of the artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris) |
17 and in AUC, 2003, one of Khanâs most striking works, fearlessly tackles this
question of individuation within a context. On one level, itâs
the self-portrait of a person, time, and place. On another
level, itâs a performative act of sado-masochistic proportions,
calling to mind the early work of Vito Acconci or Bruce Nauman.
For the two-weeksâ duration of 17 and in AUC Khan
confined himself to a glass chamber where he ate, slept, smoked,
drank, and talked incessantly while a video camera recorded him.
The glass was a soundproofed, one-way mirror so that Khan could
only see and hear himself, while the outside world could survey
him with guilty pleasure. During this time in isolation, he
recounted his uneasy experience at the American University of
Cairo (AUC), which he entered at the age of fifteen in 1990 and
from which he graduated at twenty. He called this act a
ãtechnology of communicationä tracking ãa personal investigation
of the construction of memory and persona in relation to a
specific institution and the context it is in.ä2
His fifty-six-hour monologue was then transcribed into an
unpunctuated text, which reads like one run-on sentence. The
book looks like a bound ocean of text, revealing deeply personal
accounts of Hassanâs teenage life at AUC, along with ranting and
critical reflections about the privileged place that AUC and its
student body occupy in greater Cairo. In narcissistic isolation,
Khan enacted the institutionâs own blindness and detachment from
the rest of the city. Viewers, who had often heard of this act
by word of mouth, uncomfortably became complicit with Khanâs
voyeuristic game in order to gain the power of the gaze and of
anonymity.
DOM-TAK-TAK-DOM-TAK,
2005, divides and conquers in a similar way. This sonic workâs
title refers to a dumbek sequence found in shaabi, a
popular musical genre that rose
out of Cairo's poorest districts.
Unlike Western music, traditional Middle Eastern music usually
follows standards or templates that both allow musicians to
easily play together and simultaneously enable a range of
individual interpretation and expression. This arena of
collaborative performance where degrees of personal expression
are delicately negotiated is particularly compelling to Khan.
DOM-TAK-TAK-DOM-TAK started with his re-recording and mixing
of six found shaabi standards. This remix then served as
a backdrop for individual, live street musicians to play over
and improvise with÷each performing in isolation. The
independently performed sequences were then mixed together,
producing six hybrid master instrumentals, each in some way
resembling standard shaabi fare. The resulting
compositions of disjointed performances are significantly less
dissonant than one would imagine. Ultimately, the piece
amplifies the musiciansâ performative aspirations and the vague
familiarity of a misreading in the making. Once again, the
listener is the site of confluence, and authorship is endlessly
distributed.
|
|
 |
|
Hassan Khan, partial views of the
exhibition KOMPRESSOR, 2006, constructed stage, ten-meter
wide vinyl logo
(courtesy of the artist and
Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris) |
Most recently, Londonâs
Gasworks welcomed Khan as artist-in-residence, giving him the
opportunity to realize an ambitious Gesamtkunstwerk.
Named after a car, his installation KOMPRESSOR,
2006, brought together various new and existing works, including
video, photographic elements, sound works, an off-site
audio-visual performance, a radio broadcast, and a ãspeculative
approach to exhibition-making.ä In the gallery, a device serving
as both an additive sculpture and a functional structure unified
various elements. A simple carpeted platform, it brought the
floor closer to the ceiling, creating a cozier÷albeit slightly
claustrophobic÷space in, and from, which to view the works. The
logic of the compilation of imagery was revealed in a wall text:
ãAn exhibition based on translating sets of dreams into
different forms by the dreamer.ä In the land of dreams, images
run amok, narrative is intuitive, time is non-linear and
comprehension mostly elusive. The statement thus set the stage
for the impossibility of knowing the true nature of the image
selection, which seemed both random and contiguous.
|
|
 |
|
Hassan Khan, partial views of the
exhibition KOMPRESSOR, 2006, with
The Alphabet Book, 2006
(courtesy of the
artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris) |
Placed on a shelf was the
Alphabet Book, 2006, a large magazine-like publication in
which Khan set luscious, penetrating photos÷a close-up of meat,
a lavish interior, a boy posing, a fragment of a gilt chair÷next
to a single letter. Isolated, the floating images acquire obtuse
meaning by means of proximity to their letter. Barthes once
defined the obtuse as a form of disguise: ãI believe that the
obtuse meaning carries a certain emotion. Caught up in
disguise, such emotion is never sticky, it is an emotion which
simply designates what one loves, what one wants to defend: an
emotion-value, an evaluation.ä3
There can be no obtuse image, Barthes further maintains. Obtuse
meaning has no structural stability. Its reading ãremains
suspended between the image and its description, between
definition and approximation.ä While KOMPRESSOR promises
to deliver the real, subjective self÷what could be more
subjective than oneâs dreams?÷it rearranges, and displaces, our
assumptions of what subjectivity might be. All that is left is a
notion of our own subjectivity, to which a contingent web of
associative triggers guides us.
|
|
 |
|
Hassan Khan, two single pages from The Alphabet
Book, 2006, installation: constructed stage, three
fifty-two-page handmade books, desk, and chairs, variable
dimensions, page: 80 x 40 cm, a component of the exhibition
KOMPRESSOR, 2006, at Gasworks Gallery, London (courtesy of
the artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris) |
Gasworks facilitated the
citywide spread of Khanâs tentative web of associations,
partnering with other venues for two performative works: ãa
lecture that tries to speak about images but ends up being
concerned with something else,ä in which a photo archive meets a
voice and a text, was presented at Camden Arts Centre and
Tabla Dubb, which I saw, at Whitechapelâs café. As much as
Khan values the moment of reception, I believe that the premise
of his work÷and its place in culture÷resides in his selection of
processes, vehicles, and economies of transmission. An evening
performance, Tabla Dubb was more of an informal DJ/VJ
session mixing vernacular and politicized images of Cairo in a
way that seemed to re-frame the mediaâs attitudes towards the
Middle East. What was remarkable here was Khanâs physical
engagement with the process. Sustaining a measured yet laborious
set of actions, he deftly switched videotapes in and out of the
player while mixing sound, giving the audience a very physical,
direct engagement with the process. VHS, he insisted, was the
support of choice here because he preferred the tapesâ material,
reference, and economy. In this sense, they function like actual
containers or boxes of imagery more than DVDs would. In
addition, the workâs decidedly old-school, home-boy ethos may or
may not invoke Cairoâs own industry of vernacular image
production. We might also think of Londonâs ethnic video rental
shops, or other such immigrant neighborhood economies delivering
Egyptian soap operas or Bollywood favorites to their familial
clientele.
 |
 |
|
Hassan Khan, detail of the exhibition KOMPRESSOR,
2006, with The Rams, 2006, 3 c-prints (courtesy of the
artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris) |
In Cairo, Khan regularly
presents these kinds of performances, inserting his art practice
into the domain of popular street and nightlife culture,
sometimes in collaboration with other sound/electronic artists
like Mahmoud Refat. His participation in Cairoâs growing art and
electronic music scene has, in fact, been quite explicit: Khan
has organized events and conferences, he has collaborated with
other artists, and written on art for Bidoun magazine.
Acutely aware of his agency as an artist and a content producer,
Khan has resisted partaking of strategies, curatorial and
otherwise, to represent Arabness or the Middle East. He famously
refused to show in Africa Remix at the Pompidou Center
and openly speaks out against Western institutions and mediaâs
insatiable desire to instrumentalize artists in simplistic
terms÷as if artists were responsible guides to ãexoticä and
ãdangerousä cultures. In this, he reminds me of Gabriel Orozco,
who early on also managed to bypass the route of national
representation for Mexico. For Orozco, this meant rarely showing
in Mexico City or in group shows of Mexican art abroad. Working
towards the same ends, Khan expresses his active refusal by his
insistent presence, rather than absence, in his own city. This
presence defines its own territory, its own version on its own
terms, of what it means to be from a specific place.
NOTES
1.
Unless otherwise noted, all
quotes are from the authorâs interview with the artist,
London,
July 25, 2006.
2.
Yasmeen Siddiqui, ãAn Online
Interview with Hassan Khan,ä Independent Video in Egypt,
Cairo, 2006.
3. Roland Barthes, ãThe Third Meaning,ä
Image, Music, Text,
Stephen Heath, tr., New York: Hill and Wang, 1977, 59.
Regine Basha
is a curator
and writer based in Austin, Texas. Her most recent exhibition is
Daniel Bozhkov: Recent Works at Arthouse at the Jones
Center, Austin. Her
review of the last Istanbul Biennial was published in ART PAPERS
30:1 (January/February 2006). |
|
|
|