 |
Moths to the
Flame:
Radiance and Rupture in the Work of Xie Nanxing
Text / David
Spalding
Our art is a way of being dazzled by truth: the light on
the grotesquely grimacing retreating face is true, and nothing
else.
÷Franz Kafka
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Untitled
(Picture of Voice I),
2001, oil on canvas, triptych: 220 x 380 cm (each) (courtesy of
the artist and Galerie Urs Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
Back in March,
artist Xie Nanxing invited me to his Beijing studio to see a
painting he had recently completed. While I had visited his
studio before, and was aware that he was experimenting with new
ways of working, his call caught me by surprise. Knowing that
the painting would probably not stay in China for long÷it had
already been sold to a leading European collection whose name
was near the top of a long waiting list÷I rushed to hail a taxi.
For Xie, the
creation of each new body of work is prefaced by a period of
intense reflection and inner turmoil÷about the history and
limitations of painting, the desired psychological impact of a
new series, and the knowledge gained by making his previous
works. After settling on his chosen subject, the artist begins
assembling his preparatory materials. In addition to making
sketches and studies, his process has included video since 2001.
Xie plays his video footage on a monitor, and photographs the
playback directly from the monitorâs screen. Infused with a
violent luminosity, these photographs are then transformed into
exacting, enormous paintings through Xieâs carefully controlled
application of four thin layers of oil paint÷without the aid of
projecting the image onto the canvas. He often produces
triptychs, one of which can take up to a year to finish. He had
completed this new painting in just six weeks.
I met Xie at
the modest apartment complex where he has worked for the last
six years. His studio space is a nearly empty room with a
concrete floor, a single window, and fluorescent lights
overhead÷the living room of what was intended to be a
two-bedroom flat. While many of his contemporaries have spacious
studios teaming with assistants, Xie prefers this nearly
monastic simplicity. He made me coffee and we sat on small
stools facing his latest creation.
Like Xieâs
other recent paintings, the new work, Untitled, 2006,1
revealed itself slowly. This one was unlike any I had seen
before, however, and I was, for a time, speechless. Leaning
there against the wall, it initially seemed nearly
monochromatic, a field of carmine, like lithium held over the
flame of a Bunsen burner. Then, as I studied its surface more
closely, dark patches began to appear, amorphous clouds on a
distant horizon. Except that there was no horizon, and the
smudges were refusing to assume fixed forms, generating a
strange sensation of depth as they slowly receded or leapt
forward. Xie finally broke our silence: ãKeep looking,ä he said
encouragingly, ãand tell me what you see.ä His right leg was
bouncing nervously up and down. Then they began to take shape:
the large, shadow-like bodies of two moths, seen from above, as
if through an electrified red haze. They appeared to have
collided head-on; oneâs antennae had been cleaved off in the
scuffle.
Xie pointed to
a blurred word in one of the paintingâs corners, written in a
slanting, cursive script. It had begun as Kodakâs ãRoyalä logo,
but was now obscured by additional layers of paint. The source
of the brilliant red color, he explained, was the leader on a
roll of photofinishing paper, found on the floor of a film
processing lab. The moths had been drawn to the same light, and
crashed into each other while urgently seeking its source. Xie
himself was unsettled by the painting, by what seemed to him
like a complete break from his usual way of working. While
excited by the prospect of painting more spontaneously, this
newfound freedom was also daunting. ãI feel like a kite,ä he
told me, ãwhose string has been cut.ä
To me, the
painting did not seem such a radical departure from Xieâs
previous works. Rather, it allegorizes a central aspect of the
artistâs practice: Xie enlists the videographic and photographic
mediation of his subjects and the traffic between imaging
technologies and painting÷made tangible here by the use of
photofinishing paper as the paintingâs backdrop÷to infuse his
paintings with a strange radiance, a disorienting light that
draws viewers, like moths to a flame, toward a dangerous
encounter with what Lacan called ãthe gaze,ä and ãthe real.ä
To understand
this formulation, we must review these Lacanian concepts in
relation to visual arts, a process that can be expedited by
considering Hal Fosterâs essay, ãThe Return of the Real.ä2
Citing two seminars that appear in Lacanâs The Four
Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis,3
ãThe Unconscious and Repetition,ä and ãOf the Gaze as Objet
Petit a,ä Foster reminds us that the real÷a traumatic
real÷is something that defies symbolic representation. It cannot
be perceived directly, but might be characterized as the
ãecstasy of desire shot through with death.ä4
Since the real threatens to overwhelm the subject, it must
be mediated by the ãimage-screenä of visuality, the cultural
encoding of vision that acts as a shield between the subject and
the real. However, the real still lurks beneath our
representations, which it occasionally ruptures. ãIt is a
rupture less in the world,ä Foster explains, ãthan in the
subject÷between the perception and consciousness of a subject
touched by an image.ä5
In this
equation, the gaze threatens to rupture the image-screen and
expose the subject to the real..67 Yet, surveying
contemporary art circa 1996, Foster identifies certain
practices÷Cindy Shermanâs abject photographs of the early 1990s,
for example÷that seem to court the real, to rend the
image-screen, to allow us, if only for an instant, to stare
directly into that obliterating gaze. ãIt is as if this art
wanted the gaze to shine,ä Foster writes, ãthe object to stand,
the real to exist, in all the glory (or the horror) of its
pulsatile desire, or at least to evoke this sublime condition.ä
With his
astonishing technical skill and conceptual rigor, Xie Nanxing
creates paintings that stage profound confrontations between the
viewer and the dazzling, vertiginous real. Taking his subjects
through a complex cycle of technical mediations that abrades the
surface of the image-screen, he draws out a magnetic, devouring
light that seems to pulse across the surfaces of his canvases.
By rendering disfigured scenes in his super-realistic style, he
reveals an anxiety to seal off the real, but deliberately leaves
the project incomplete, so that this anxiety becomes a
contagion, infecting viewers. To stand in front of one of Xieâs
paintings for any length of time takes a certain amount of
courage.
As the artist explained to me,
Since the beginning of civilization, people have seen
reality through the glasses of culture. Over time, the lenses in
these glasses have grown thicker and thicker. Today they are as
thick as long telescopes! Using video and photography in my
painting, I try to make people aware of these glasses. As an
artist, I cannot stand alone. I need a cane, and this cane is
the light you see in my paintings. People cannot live without
their glasses, but I do try to smash them with this cane!ä8
 |
 |
Untitled (No. 5), 1998, oil on canvas,
190 x 150 cm (private collection) |
|
 |
 |
 |
Untitled (No. 9), 1999, oil on canvas,
190 x 150 cm (private collection) |
|
While American
audiences have still had no opportunity to see Xieâs paintings
without traveling abroad, curators and collectors have sought
out his work ever since his breakthrough inclusion in the 1999
Venice Biennale. The four paintings presented at the Biennale
depict scenes of shocking, sexualized violence and its
aftermath. Appropriating the visual codes of photography, the
paintings resemble crime-scene photos taken through a fish-eye
lens÷a technical trick that Xie developed in his earliest
paintings, made in 1992, while he was still a student at the
Sichuan Academy of Fine Arts in Chengdu. In Untitled (No. 5),
1998, two men stand in an empty room whose floor is littered
with toilet paper. One bends over to display his bleeding anus,
while the other crouches next to him, his forehead streaked with
blood, his mouth a howling smile. A Calla lily rises in the
foreground, blurred as if seen through a cameraâs lens. In
Untitled (No. 9), 1999, a partially opened door reveals a
small bedroom with a bare, blood-stained mattress lying on the
floor. Inside, a young man with jaundiced eyes and red smears
around his mouth, naked from the waist up, looks out at the
viewer. He stands with his pants around his ankles, massaging
the pregnant belly that bulges over his penis.
The events in
these paintings seem to have been expelled from the darkest
corners of the artistâs unconscious, so that they might lodge
themselves indelibly in the viewerâs mind. But beyond the abject
feelings they evoke, what is fascinating about the paintings
from 1998-1999 is that, while Xie uses the tropes of photography
with striking exactitude to create an uneasy realism, the
paintings were not based on photographs. Forging the cameraâs
distorting, mechanized gaze, the series highlights photographyâs
ability to lend even the most bizarre scenes an air of reality.
Xie has described these works as ãtheatrical,ä9
and they are the last of his overtly narrative paintings.
 |
 |
|
Untitled (Liquid),
2000, oil on canvas, 220 x 380 cm (courtesy of the artist and
Galerie Urs Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Untitled
(Flame),
2000, oil on
canvas, 220 x 380 cm (courtesy of the artist and Galerie Urs
Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
|
It would seem
that the lesson the artist extracted from the 1998-1999 series
was that the mediated image strikes closer to the essence of the
subject. Thus with the following series of 1999-2000, Xie
inverts his previous method, making photographs in and around
his studio the basis for five remarkable paintings that imbue
their banal subjects with an uncanny, predatory realism. With
its slightly skewed angle and eerie lighting, Untitled
(Corridor), 1999, suggests an institutional hallway, seen
through the eyes of a drugged patient who is attempting an
escape. Untitled (Liquid), 2000, is a pool of black fluid
that appears tumescent, seductive, and toxic, moving as if by
its own volition toward a flash of light reflected on the
floor. Untitled (Flame), 2000, invites viewers to stare
directly into the lit burner of a gas stove, where flickers of
blue, red, and white-hot fire overtake the canvas. All of the
paintings from 1999-2000 reveal that our mundane surroundings
mask something at once sinister and alluring: the real. Indeed,
Lacan calls the screen of representation a mask, which Xie pulls
at relentlessly. Were we to fall into that shimmering, oily
darkness, or abandon ourselves to the heart of the flames, we
might catch a glimpse of what lies beyond their perfectly
painted surfaces.
Xieâs
subsequent works are marked by the introduction of the video
camera as the generator of images from which his paintings
gradually emerge. Photographing the video images as they appear
on a monitor, Xie captures a disorienting light that he
translates, as if by some dark art, into his works. In the
triptych Untitled (Picture of Voice 1), 2001, which
depicts a highway seen at night through the windshield of a
moving car, the use of video breaks the picture into a series of
minute, horizontal bands, making the image-screen of
representation seem all the more fragile. In the central
painting, an oncoming car rushes toward the viewer, one of its
headlights transformed into the blinding flash of a solar
eclipse. Assaulting viewers with this light, the painting
attempts the impossible task of rendering the real symbolically,
but the light is also an hypnotic abstraction, reaching out
through the artificial surface of the painted video to lock the
viewer in its intractable gaze.
The power of
the gaze to eviscerate the subject is further explored in Xieâs
2002-2003 series of six paintings.
 |
 |
|
Untitled (No.
4),
2003, oil on canvas, 150 x 360 cm (courtesy of the artist and
Galerie Urs Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Untitled (No. 5),
2003, oil on canvas, 150 x 360 cm (courtesy of the artist and
Galerie Urs Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
|
Rendered in
the hazy, muted hues of a weak-signaled television broadcast,
these long, horizontal canvases show solitary, male and female
figures lying naked on the floor of a nearly empty room. In this
melancholic space, time seems to stretch on infinitely. Itâs as
if these figures had always been here. Are they even alive? A
small window in the background surges with a frightening light
that seems to rupture them into oblivion. The seriesâ later
paintings show the room devoid of life, as if these figures,
vulnerable and exposed, had vaporized upon contact with the
real. In the final painting, even the roomâs furniture is gone,
the starkness making it seem as though the previously witnessed
scenes took place long ago.
Discussing his
production process for this series with critic and curator
Nataline Colonnello÷an authority on Xieâs work÷the artist spoke
of the incredible psychological challenges he faced, as he fell
under the gaze that he conjured:
Although in my works there is light, well, that light is
really driving me to death. Help! It seems as if I was forced to
have this very long dream·at the beginning I wanted to control
my creations but during the pictorial process I found myself
gradually dominated by them; finally, the one who was held
hostage was me!!10
 |
 |
|
Untitled (No.
2),
2004, oil on canvas, 218 x 323 cm (courtesy of the artist and
Galerie Urs Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Untitled (No.
3),
2004, oil on canvas, 220 x 385 (courtesy of the artist and
Galerie Urs Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
|
Yet Xie continues to reach toward the dazzling light that
emanates from behind the screen of representation. He has
recently developed a new technique to create his Untitled,
2005 triptych, which is loosely based on Van Goghâs depiction of
a billiard hall in his famous Night Café in the Place
Lamartine of 1888. Billiards is one of Xieâs favorite
hobbies. For Van Gogh, the pool hall represented a place whose
pleasant exterior trappings concealed something sinister. In a
letter written shortly after the painting was completed, Van
Gogh explains:
I have tried
to express the idea that the cafe is a place where one can ruin
one's self, run mad or commit a crime. So I have tried to
express as it were the powers of darkness in a low drink
shop...and all this in an atmosphere like a devil's furnace, of
pale sulfur, all under an appearance of Japanese gaiety and the
good nature of Tartarin..
 |
 |
|
Untitled (No.2),
2005, oil on canvas, 220 x 385 cm (courtesy of the artist and
Galerie Urs Meile, Lucerne and Beijing) |
Xie started
the 2005 series by making a small painting based on Van Goghâs
work, using a visceral palette of reds. As if staging an
experiment that literalizes Lacanâs notion of the gaze in
relation to representation, the artist shone a very bright lamp
on the surface of the canvas, and shot video footage of its
backside, where the image of the billiard table was visible in
reverse, pierced and irradiated by flashes of light. As with
previous series, the video was then played and photographed, and
these photographs were transformed into three huge paintings
(approximately 7.2 x 12.6 feet each). The result is a
photorealistic depiction of a nearly abstract image being eroded
by light.
Standing before these paintings, the viewer is overwhelmed
by a powerful sensation of confusion and even dizziness. The
distorted depth of focus causes their surfaces to take on a
three-dimensionality that lures the viewer into an explosive
scene. When I saw these works at the China Art Archives and
Warehouse in Beijing last fall, I had to go upstairs to the
galleryâs small landing to view them from a distance, for fear
of losing myself to the fiery grasp of that ãdevilâs furnace.ä
A few weeks
ago, I visited Xieâs studio again. He was beginning work on a
new series. Lately, he told me, he has been under a great deal
of pressure: difficulties making the new work had been
compounded by a stream of visits from international curators
interested in Chinese art, including representatives from
Documenta 12. But he had recently resolved his technical
setbacks, and was feeling buoyant.
Xie began the
new works by making very rough, small paintings, which he then
put through the usual cycle of video and photographic mediation.
It seems the painting of the moths had been an anomaly. We sat
on the studio floor and looked at the materials that would
inform the works. One photograph, taken from the video monitor,
showed a topiary peacock in a dusky light, shimming with an
iridescent glow of turquoise, cobalt, sapphire, and jade. It was
both there and not there, as if materializing before the
viewerâs eyes, a ghost image composed of particles of light,
rather than leaves and shrubbery.
A
work-in-progress stood on one side of the studio, a painting of
a mysterious night garden whose shadows would eventually brim
with a muted perversity÷sexually suggestive shapes that would be
obscured by subsequent layers of paint. Looking at the images
used to create the work, I saw small patches of red that, when
photographed from the video monitor, became flashes of light,
seen as if coming through the trees. ãTheyâre·ä he growled,
searching for the word, ãemergency lights.ä
It made sense.
The work of Xie Nanxing leads viewers into the dark forest of
the unconscious. By mediating the picture-screen until it
ruptures, and rendering the results with unparalleled skill, he
guides us toward confrontations with the real. The flashes of
light in his work may be taken as signs of a crisis, but Xieâs
paintings create psychologically profound experiences that draw
viewers back, again and again.
NOTES
1.
Unless otherwise noted,
all of Xie Nanxingâs paintings referred to in this essay are
untitled.
2. Hal Foster, The Return
of the Real, Cambridge, Mass.:
MIT Press, 1996, 127-168.
3. Jacques Lacan, The
Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, Alan Sheridan,
trans., New York: W.W. Norton, 1978.
4. Foster, 146.
5. Ibid., 132.
6. For the sake of brevity,
I am eliding Fosterâs complex argument about the relationship
between the gaze and the real.
7. Foster, 140.
8. Authorâs conversation
with Xie Nanxing, Beijing, May 16, 2006.
9. Quoted by Nataline
Colonnello, ãUntitled: A Garbled Visual Grammar,ä in Xie
Nanxing, Paintings: 1992-2004, Ai Weiwei, Nataline
Colonnello and Chen Weiqun, eds., Lucerne and Beijing: Galerie
Urs Meile and Time Zone 8, Ltd, 2004), 71.
10. Ibid., 75.
11. Letter from Vincent Van
Gogh quoted in Meyer Schapiro, Van Gogh, New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1994, 69-71.
Contributing Editor David Spalding is an independent curator who
divides his time between San Francisco and Beijing. |